Altamonte Springs proposes to raise taxes by nearly 29 percent

By Barbara Haiss Martin

Altamonte Springs proposes to raise taxes by nearly 29 percent – The first of two public hearings was held Tues., Sept. 3 at 7 p.m. at City Hall to discuss approving the budget for next year and included whether to raise the city taxes 29 percent. Four of five Commissioners have already agreed to it. Only Commissioner Jim Turney (Libertarian) is against the proposal.

This brouhaha started with a Press Release to shut down the library due to a $400,000 shortfall (later adjusted to $600,000). Once the community was enflamed at the thought of losing their beloved library, 40 people (whose only interest was in saving the library) came to a hastily called millage rate meeting on July 18, only to hear that in order to save the library the millage rate had to be raised from 3.1 to 4 and that it would only cost them about $8 a month. The increase raises more than $4.37 million — far more than the $600,000 needed for the library budget. City Manager Frank Martz later said in an interview with a TV reporter that the rest of the money would be used to stabilize other departments/programs in the City. While this was mentioned at the meeting, there was minimal discussion about other shortfall problems in the City.

According to the minutes, most of the emotionally charged people spoke at the public hearing and after hearing the choices said, “Yes, raise my taxes.” Only two people, besides Turney, opposed the increase. One person said he had rental properties in Altamonte and while he worked hard to keep the rates down for his tenants, he said he would unfortunately have to pass on the full amount of the tax to his tenants.

The basis of the $8 a month increase was not explained at the meeting but five taxing authorities go into a Seminole County tax bill: County, City, School Board, Fire and the St. John’s Water Management.

A call to the Property Appraiser’s office revealed this about the 2024-2025 millage rates:

• County – no change
• City of Altamonte Springs – proposed change from 3.1 to 4.
• School Board – slight decrease 3.13 to 3.03
• Fire – no change
• St. John’s Water Management – no change

Additionally, other cities in Seminole either remained the same or had a slight increase except the City  of Sanford which had a slight decrease.

According to the clerk at the Appraiser’s office, the $88 a year increase in taxes ($7.33 a month) came from a statement the Property Appraiser made in relation to a general increase throughout all of Seminole County.  

But that won’t be the case in Altamonte Springs since the City’s taxes are not spread throughout the County.  If the proposed rate is approved from 3.1 to 4, for every $100,000 of assessed value of someone’s home, residents will be charged about $100. The assessed value equals the market value less any homestead or Save Our Homes benefits and less any Exemptions.

Of course, the biggest tax bearers in the City are the business owners and their tenants, including property rental companies (private homes, apartments, businesses). They do not qualify for homestead exemptions or assessment reduction programs. With businesses already struggling, additional taxes  would have to be passed on to business tenants and consumers and result in higher prices for goods and services.

The second public hearing will be held on Sept. 17.

Questions:

1. Why were the July 18 minutes transcribed so meticulously? Minutes usually come with general comments. Was it necessary to get those “Yes, raise my taxes” comments on the record so the Commissioners felt like they had a mandate?
2. All the cities and counties are feeling the pinch financially, but why is Altamonte the only one raising taxes 29 percent?
3. Why is the only Republican Commissioner standing with the “raise the taxes” crowd? Why is the Libertarian, Tunney, the only one standing up against this large increase?
4. Budgets are all about spending for the next year, but what about savings? The last time I noticed an audit by the City (2021), they had $39 million in savings. Can’t they just take $600,000 from the kitty and save the library for a year until the economy stabilizes instead of causing an uproar with the citizens and overtaxing them?
5. With two Democrats and one Independent (or NPA) rounding out the board, is this just another “Don’t waste a crisis” hustle.
   • Create the crisis
   • Have a hastily called meeting
   • Offer only one solution — overtaxing the populace. (Residents suggested other options but most were dismissed by the Commission.)

Obviously, this was never about the library. It was just a useful tool to emotionally manipulate people to raise taxes. 

We all know how we got here. The current administration did everything possible to destroy our economy and the rest of us are waiting for a November election to set things straight and stabilize our economy.  I believe the City of Altamonte Springs should wait as well.

Barbara Haiss Martin is an award-winning journalist who has lived in Altamonte Springs with her family since 1972

Altamonte Springs proposes to raise taxes by nearly 29 percent

Thanks for reading “Altamonte Springs proposes to raise taxes by nearly 29 percent” by the SeminoleGOP.org

Fighting Propaganda: Check Your Sources

If you’ve been following the findings of Republican Rep. Jim Jordan’s Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, then you know that the existence of a “Censorship Complex” targeting conservatives and right-leaning news outlets is not a “conspiracy theory” but an actual conspiracy. And worse, the collusion between Big Tech and the federal government was funded by your tax dollars through the Department of Defense and its CISA subagency.

The House Judiciary Select Committee report from June 26, 2023 details their findings.

CISA, we learn from the report, is “a little-known agency buried in the depths of DHS” that creepily expanded its mission in the name of combatting ‘foreign disinformation’ and later “began surveilling and censoring American citizens online, directly and by proxy.”

The primary targets were then candidate and President Donald J. Trump, his son Don Jr., and a host of conservative individuals including former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Mollie Hemingway, Jack Posobiec, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, along with media outlets like One America News, New York Post and Newsmax. Even parody publications like Babylon Bee did not escape the attack on free speech.

You can read all the reports from the House Judiciary Committee and Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on the House Judiciary website.

In the House Select Subcommittee’s Nov. 6, 2023 report it’s revealed that the suppression of free speech began “in the lead-up to the 2020 election, amid the COVID-19 pandemic.” As Americans and lawmakers were openly discussing changes in election laws and procedures that were happening mid-cycle “their constitutionally protected speech was intentionally suppressed as a consequence of the federal government’s direct coordination with third-party organizations, particularly universities, and social media platforms.”

The Supreme Court has previously ruled that it’s a given that the government cannot outsource actions that are unconstitutional. The House Select Subcommittee rightly observes that such censorship-by-proxy is “an especially nefarious form of state action, given that it is designed to evade detection, oversight efforts, and public records requests.”

The Big Tech actors, left-leaning organizations, and, sadly, weaponized government agencies will no doubt be at it again in 2024. They will find new ways to keep tearing down our constitutional republic, through lawfare like denying Trump a place on the ballot, using divisive propaganda, pushing for mass mail-in voting, and censoring citizens (in the U.S. and abroad).

In the March 2023 hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger, called out a news-rating company, NewsGuard, and the Global Disinformation Index as part of the vast Censorship Complex. In his testimony, Taibbi revealed that NewsGuard received $750,000 in funding from the DoD.

At the same March 9, 2023 hearing, Schellenberger testified:

“NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index, both taxpayer-funded, are urging advertisers to boycott disfavored publications, and direct their funding to favored ones. The organizations have been caught spreading disinformation, including that the COVID lab leak theory is a debunked conspiracy theory, and seeking to discredit publications which accurately reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, such as the New York Post.”

The disinformation spread is pervasive. According to its own website and news releases, NewsGuard partners include Microsoft Education, Bing, the U.S. Department of State, The American Federation of Teachers, University of Michigan, Giphy, PubMatic, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission and the World Health Organization. Elon Musk, CEO of X (formerly Twitter) called NewsGuard a “scam” that should be disbanded.

In true Owellian fashion, it turns out NewsGuard’s “red-rated” media outlets (those deemed unreliable) are likely the most reliable sources around. Among the censored or “red-rated” news outlets are One America News, Newsmax, Gateway Pundit, and The Federalist.

Despite their efforts, a majority of Americans seem to be tuning out the propaganda. Let’s hope.

As we enter the fight of our lives against the statists in the 2024 Election Cycle, we must be vigilant to protect free speech and call out violations to our individual rights. At the very least, we should be aware of the very real collusion between Big Tech and the federal government to suppress free speech.

Here’s a list of favorite conservative news sources from Liberty Nation, no doubt “red-rated” by NewsGuard. But you can be the judge.

Thanks for reading “Fighting Propaganda: Check Your Sources” by the SeminoleGOP.org